Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Taking Customer Engagement Offline


The thing with every silver lining is that it has a cloud attached to it. In the last few decades, banks have taken giant strides in the use of automation. The electronic channel became – and possibly still is – the poster child of banking technology. Starting with the ATM, banks have used online channels, including the Kiosk, Internet and Mobile to revolutionize banking operations, service delivery and reach. And to engage with customers on an unprecedented scale, one-on-one, anytime, anywhere, at really low cost. But the flip side of success of customer engagement in online channels is that it is putting offline engagement in the shade, very often at the cost of customer loyalty.

This is why I believe banks should be concerned.

1. Despite the explosion in unassisted channel usage, the branch is still the most popular channel of banking in most parts of the world. While the proportion of branch transactions to the total may have fallen, the absolute number has not. 

2. Most important, even customers who routinely use self-service banking, seek the help of a bank employee when faced with a complex transaction, an important financial decision, or an annoying problem that they’re unable to solve by themselves. Thus the branch or call centre is still customers’ go-to channel for transactions that matter more than others.

And hence, nothing is more important than using that interaction to engage with customers deeply and meaningfully.

But how can the banks match the convenience at the branch or call centre with that of online channels, which are not only open all-hours, but also have the support of powerful interactive tools, such as websites, Personal Financial Management apps, blogs and social networks? Simple. By leveraging the one thing that these have, and online channels don’t – people.

In my book, empowering bank staff is the first step to creating better engagement.  Employees must be trained and empowered via technology in functional aspects as well as soft skills; the more versatile the technology, the greater the quality of engagement. Umpqua Bank – a small bank in the U.S. – is living proof of this. The bank has a flat hierarchy in which a single “bank store” (as their branches are called) manager is assisted by a team of universal associates, all of whom are trained to perform multiple roles. By freeing employees of a “departmental” mind set and making service everyone’s responsibility, the bank has managed to build long-lasting relationships with customers.

Creating intimacy is equally important. With customers walking into the branch less frequently, every visit must be viewed as a rare opportunity to get to know them better. Banks must create a welcoming environment and allow them enough “free” time to attend to customers. Only then will staff – currently immersed in transaction fulfilment – be able to focus on customer engagement. They must also be provided customer information in an easy, intuitive manner so they can put their best foot forward in serving customers better. Also, banks must equip their employees to engage customers better is by providing them with adequate insight. This does not only mean giving branch and call centre staff visibility into customers’ transaction history and entire banking relationship in real time; the information must come with intelligent suggestions on what they can do to take the current interaction to the next level of engagement. 

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

The Unappreciated Secret(s) of Banking Success If your bank doesn't have a Betty or hundreds of Bettys, it's time to change banks.


http://banktech.com/blogs/229500738
Original author:  Art Gillis (May 17, 2011)

Excerpts: The author is looking at the need for the "friendly BETTY" of the good old days of banking -some good comments from him

  1. banks thought platform automation meant a conveyor belt?
  2. She even wanted to know the name of the contractor my wife hired to shape up the house she bought for us. For years, whenever I called the bank, Betty would say, "Leave it to me, I'll take care of it."
  3. These days, that very large bank cannot engage in free-form dialogue unless a customer has something plugged into his/her ear. 
  4. And even though it took four decades for cashless and checkless to become partial realities, it is "peopleless" in banking that I believe will be the last blow to what was once a nice place to conduct business while providing work for lots of Bettys and a few good Bobs.
  5. If your bank turns into a mausoleum, driven only by technology, without the Bettys, you'll lose the one distinguishing resource that makes the bank unique.
  6.     Any bank can buy today's technology, but it takes talent to acquire the right Bettys. 
My Analysis: People are pining for the human based "collective intelligence" on tap for every touch point - which could have been possible only if only i had "my personal betty" . Of course while this is the ideal situation, the good old BETTY is retired or retiring shortly... and the BETTY junior is too young and needs another decade to become a GOOD Ol BETTY - so how does one solve this issue. 
Here is where smart human like realtime technology comes in - a customer state machine approach which refactors everything i realtime is the need of the hour. This essentially has the potential to make every employee of the bank, "my personal Junior BETTY"
These technologies has to be so fundamentally different from the ones in existence today. A fresh perspective is required for the same - It is UN-Database is nature, UN-Data warehouse in nature, UN-Query based approach in nature, UN- variable in nature, UN-traditional software process and methodology in nature....Very few companies can match this "UN" of everything... especially large companies- that way this introduces significant entry barriers for everyone- therein lies the silver lining :)

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Foreign banks' India heads responsible for compliance: RBI

http://goo.gl/UW2O5


The highlights of RBI's notice to all MNC banks functioning in India

1. The Reserve Bank said that the Indian Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of the entire foreign bank functioning in India (34 MNC banks) would be responsible for oversight of regulatory and statutory compliances.

2. RBI has also expressed concerns about;
a)   The adequacy of regulatory compliance by foreign banks in India
b)   The reporting model of the unit heads (reporting directly to Functional Heads located outside the country)

3. The Indian CEOs (of MNC banks) will be responsible for compliance with the norms of the central bank.

Analysis:    Hey i was wondering how could Bank CEO's enforce this in letter & Spirit - Post facto reporting and compliance is one thing, when the going is good. However this approach of post facto reporting is ineffective, when a surprise event happens.  The only and the best way bank CEO's can enforce this is if they get realtime intelligence about their business - not fortnightly, not weekly, not end of day - but right NOW!  

It is but natural that, one will see renewed efforts by CXO's to get these pattern based information in realtime - so that preventive steps can be taken NOW.  A REPORT by its very nature means, that one was caught unawares!

Enhanced by Zemanta